Cognitive aptitude assessment for cybersecurity

Every cyber talent pool is a haystack. We find the needles.

CyberGEN.IQ identifies the people with the aptitude to excel in cybersecurity, regardless of background, so organizations can build stronger teams faster

Scattered signals resolve into the four profiles of cyber work that CyberGEN.IQ measures against.
Administered
10,000+
Cognitive tasks
14
Results map to
NIST/NICE Framework

Organizations using CyberGEN.IQ

See all partners
University of Maryland logoVirginia Tech logoNorwich University logoUniversity of North Georgia logoWiCyS (Women in CyberSecurity) logoActivateWork logoDEAFCYBERCON logo

The cyber talent identification problem

Conventional screening reads history, not aptitude

One population of 288 people
  • Holds a cyber credential
  • Aptitude, no credential
  • Not identified

Gap

Resumes, certifications, and knowledge tests describe what a person has been taught, not how they think when a situation is new, ambiguous, or moving faster than the playbook

  • Prior cyber knowledge is a proxy for access, not for capability
  • One overall score can't show where a person fits in cyber
  • Candidates are selected before anyone sees them do real cyber work

How CyberGEN.IQ works

Five cognitive dimensions, four profiles of cyber work

Fourteen tasks measure five cognitive dimensions, mapping to four cyber work profiles

The contrast between the dimensions points to the kind of cyber work they fit

How the assessment works

Participant profile

relative strength, percentile
Critical Thinking
78 Initiating
64 Responding
41 Real-Time
36 Exhaustive
81

Each kind of cyber work makes a different cognitive demand

The profile says which demand a person meets most naturally

  • Offensive Operations

    Find the way in that nobody documented, while the window is open.

    Demands
    InitiatingReal-Time
    Red team, penetration testing
  • Defensive Operations

    Notice the one anomaly in a stream that runs all shift, then act on it.

    Demands
    RespondingReal-Time
    SOC analysis, incident response
  • Design and Development

    Build the thing that holds up against attacks nobody has tried yet.

    Demands
    InitiatingExhaustive
    Security architecture, engineering
  • Analysis and Forensics

    Reconstruct what happened from evidence that is incomplete on purpose.

    Demands
    RespondingExhaustive
    Intelligence analysis, forensics

One input alongside skills, experience, and your program criteria

Organizational pathways

Find the decision you are trying to make.

Organizational inquiry

Tell us the decision you need to get right

A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether CyberGEN.IQ fits your program